Soviets Pay Lip
Service to Latvian Independence, Hilter and Stalin Carve Up the Baltics
 |
 |
We've highlighted key dates and
annotated events to make it easier to follow.
 |
The
purpose of this publication is to provide historical and documentary evidence
of the facts that the genocide carried out in Soviet Russia and in the
countries annexed by her is an essential part of the administrative and
economic system founded by the Bolshevik party. The fate of Latvia and the
other Baltic States during World War II was not an accident in foreign policy,
but a carefully prepared and planned action of the Kremlin towards world
domination, towards a pax sovietica. |
August 11, 1920 Russia renounces any claim to Latvian
territory |
In the
peace treaty between Latvia and Russia, signed on August 11, 1920, in Riga, the
Government of the Federal Socialist Republic of Russian Soviets declared:
"Russia unreservedly recognizes the independence, self-subsistency and
sovereignty of the Latvian State and voluntarily and for ever renounces all
sovereign rights over the Latvian people and territory". |
December 3, 1922 Russian War Department lobbies to
invade Baltics March 3, 1925 Russia
declares Baltic fears of Russian aggression groundless |
On
December 3, 1922, at an extraordinary meeting of the Politbureau, the Head of
the War Information Department suggested that Poland should be encouraged to
occupy Lithuania while, simultaneously, two army corps of the Red Army should
invade Estonia. It was Lenin who severely criticized this plan, calling it an
adventure which would shatter the international position of Russia and destroy
her foreign trade. The discussions ended by a majority of votes accepting
Lenin's thesis and by rejecting the scheme of the War Department. The
dissentient votes were those of Stalin and of a member of the War Council.
Stalin never forgot this failure. After Lenin's death he ordered the Estonian
Communist party to organize a putsch in Tallin on December 1, 1924,
which in the case of success should be followed by the proclamation of the
Estonian Soviet Republic. However, this coup de main failed and the plan
of the Politbureau to occupy the Baltic had to be postponed. Some time
afterwards, Chicherin, then Foreign Commissar, declared at the meeting of the
Central Executive Committee on March 3, 1925, that the fear of the Baltic
States of a possible aggression on the part of Moscow was groundless, because
Moscow respected the treaties concluded by her. |
| |
When
Great Britain, on May 26, 1927, interrupted her diplomatic relations with the
Soviet Union and revoked her trade covenant, the rate of exchange of the Soviet
chervonyets fell rapidly and the total of Soviet foreign short-term debts
approached the figure of one milliard gold roubles. During this economic crisis
Moscow urged to conclude the negotiations started as early as 1923 on a trade
covenant with Latvia which was concluded in June 1927. It was the 21st trade
agreement Latvia signed. |
1928 Bolshevik influence in Latvian politics |
Apart
from the considerable reductions of customs duties on Soviet import goods (e.g.
100% on iron and raw oils) which this pact involved, Latvia built an up-to-date
free port at Liepaja for Soviet requirements as well as storehouses in Riga,
changed her principal railway lines to Russian gauge and carried out the
transportation of Soviet goods at a rate which was 75% below her own tariffs.
Now the peace policy of another state was invariably interpreted by the
Politbureau as a sign of weakness and exploited accordingly. The illegal
Communist party of Latvia, numbering in 1928 only 650 members (out of a
population of 1,845,000) and 1.2% of the total of workers, gathered in the
trade unions, only being under communist influence, the extensive cadre of
Soviet commercial agencies in Latvia lavishly subsidized it with a view to
activizing communist propaganda in Latvia and reconquering the positions lost
after the land reform was carried out. These agencies made a point of
emphasizing the dependence of the longshoremen and transport workers on Soviet
export. Obeying the directions given by the Comintern, the bolsheviks
participated in the Latvian parliament elections in 1928 with two camouflaged
lists, thus obtaining 7% of all votes. |
1932 Non-aggression treaties signed. |
Being
afraid of both Japan and Germany, the Kremlin now sought an understanding with
Poland and France, offering non-aggression treaties which were signed by
Lithuania in 1931, and by Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Poland and France in 1932.
According to these pacts, the contracting parties promised to refrain from any
kind of aggression against their reciprocal territories and sovereignties. By
means of a supplementary protocol, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania, on April 4,
1934, extended their non-aggression treaties till December 31, 1945. |
1933 Russia suggests special convention on definition of
"aggression" |
After the
Japanese invasion of Manchuria and Hitler's assumption of power, the fear of
war continued to determine the foreign policy of the Kremlin. When the United
States renewed, in 1933, their interrupted diplomatic relations with the Soviet
Union, the latter began to collaborate closely with the western democracies and
soon became a member of the League of Nations. As an introduction to this new
course in Soviet policy, Litvinov suggested to all the Border States a special
convention for the definition of aggression, which was signed on July 3, 1933,
by Estonia, Latvia and Poland, and at a later date by Lithuania and
Finland. |
December 20, 1933 "Aggression" is pretty much anything
Russia doesn't care for in another country's internal or foreign policy |
Six
months had not yet passed since the London Convention was signed, when
Litvinov, on December 20, 1933, submitted to Mr. Beck, Poland's Foreign
Minister, a proposal to guarantee in a common declaration the political and
economic independence of Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. In the course
of the negotiations it appeared that the planned declaration would entitle the
two guarantors to regard as a threat to their independence almost every change
in their internal and foreign policy, constitution and international relations.
It practically meant the division of the Baltic area into Soviet and Polish
influence spheres. With the exception of Lithuania, the rest of the Baltic
States rejected this proposal of the Kremlin. |
1934 Eastern Pact for Baltic security
fails. November 20, 1934 Litvinov
suggests Russia and Germany will negotiate directly (to carve up spheres of
influence) |
It was M.
Barthou, Foreign Minister of France, who prepared the draft of the new Eastern
Pact on collective securities to the Baltic States. According to this draft,
the pact was to be signed by eight eastern and central European States while an
additional security was to be granted through the Franco-Soviet guaranties
which had to bridge the gap between the Locarno Pact and the Eastern Pact.
However, Poland was categorically opposed to this scheme and demanded the
exclusion of Czechoslovakia and Lithuania from this pact. Herr von Neurath,
German Foreign Minister, in his memorandum of September 1, 1934, gave an
elusive answer, pointing out that Germany could not assume new military
obligations while she was not yet rehabilitated as far as her armament was
concerned. Under these circumstances the Baltic States decided to take up an
observing attitude, although, during a confidential conversation on November
20, 1934, Litvinov informed their ministers: "Should the conclusion of the
Eastern Pact prove a failure, Russia will open direct negotiations with
Germany." |
March
13, 1938 Hitler marches into Austria March 15, 1939 Germany incorporates Czechoslovakia March 22, 1939 Lithuania cedes Memel to
Germany |
In 1938
Hitler openly initiated his "Anschluss" policy by marching into Austria on
March 13. Next, he demanded the incorporation of Sudetia into the Reich, to
which Great Britain, France and Italy gave their consent at the Munich
Conference on September 29, 1938. By this fateful decision a revision of the
borders of the new States, laid down at the Versailles Peace Conference, was
sanctioned. Having ascertained the inability of the western democracies to
check the German aggression, Hitler took further measures. On March 15, 1939,
Dr. Hacha, President of Czechoslovakia, accepted Germany's ultimatum and signed
the covenant of the Protectorate which put an end to the existence of the
Czechoslovakian State. On March 22, Lithuania was compelled to cede the Memel
region to Germany. |
March
29, 1939 Russia declares Latvia and Estonia to be in its sphere of
influence |
In this
situation the Soviet Union again actively interfered in the Baltic affairs
which, however, did not prevent her foreign policy, directed by Litvinov, to
continue officially in the old fairway, while unofficially, under Stalin's high
command, a new course was being looked for. On March 29, 1939, Litvinov handed
to the Latvian and Estonian ministers in Moscow a declaration informing them
that the USSR would be unable to continue her role of observer if there existed
treaties and agreements which tended in a open camouflaged way to restrict the
independence of their States. By this declaration the Kremlin had unilaterally
determined that the Baltic States were in the Soviet influence sphere. To this
Latvia and Estonia answered that they would defend their neutrality and that
they could not allow a third State in a direct or indirect way to influence
their freedom of action. On receiving these answers Litvinov added: "The
responsibility of the Soviet Union begins at the moment when Latvia stops
taking care of her independence or when this care proves insufficient under the
existing threatening circumstances." |
| Roosevelt seeks peace guarantees. Great Britain already
negotiating with Russia. |
A week
after Latvia's answer to the USSR, Mr. Roosevelt proposed to Hitler and
Mussolini to guarantee a 10 years' peace to 21 European and eastern States.
Among these were mentioned also the Baltic States. However, three days before,
diplomatic negotiations were opened between Great Britain and the Soviet Union
on possibilities of forming an anti-aggression front. The Soviets suggested to
conclude a military alliance with France and Great Britain, which the latter
refused, suggesting, in her turn, a three-power mutual assistance pact. |
March
10, 1939 Stalin signals publicly that he is ready to cut a deal with
Hitler |
Meanwhile—to make Hitlerite Germany understand Moscow's
readiness to open separate negotiations with Berlin, Stalin delivered a speech
at the 18th Congress of the Bolshevik party on March 10, 1939, in which he
mentioned that the French, British and American press were spreading
provocative rumours with a view to setting USSR against Germany. Berlin,
indeed, understood the meaning of this allusion. Both parties tried to find
clandestine ways to get into touch with one another in an unofficial manner,
pleading negotiations on a German-Soviet economic agreement. The Soviets chose
for their mediator Draganov, the Bulgarian minister in Moscow, while Germany's
authorized representative was count Ciano. |
March
3, 1939 Litvinov out, Molotov in |
During
the negotiations, on March 3, Stalin quite suddenly dismissed Litvinov, who had
since 1921 been directing the official Soviet foreign policy, from his office,
and replaced him by V. Molotov, a member of the Politbureau. These changes were
received in Berlin with obvious satisfaction. It meant that Moscow renounced
the system of collective agreements hitherto practised, the League of Nations
and collaboration with the western democracies. Since the time of the
Brest-Litovsk Treaties (1918), with which Imperial Germany saved the bolshevik
regime from ruin, Stalin consistently maintained the view that it was in the
Russian interests to lead a germanophile policy. Despite the anti-Hitlerite
bolshevik propaganda, he highly prized the Führer and national-socialist
Germany, despising, at the same time, all parliamentary States. After the
French and British capitulation at Munich, the Politbureau concluded that the
agreements of these democracies with the Kremlin would not keep USSR out of a
war and that a second world war might even mean the destruction of the Soviet
regime. |
June
2, 1939 Molotov plays Baltic card to stall Great Britain and France |
When
Hitler had agreed on principle to a political convention with Stalin in the
division of the influence spheres in eastern Europe, Molotov began to delay the
negotiations already initiated with Great Britain and France by putting forward
new Soviet demands. In his answer of June 2 to the British proposal of a
three-power assistance pact Molotov connected it with common securities to the
Baltic States. Since Zhdanov, who was then omnipotent, had as early as 1936 in
a speech demanded the annexation of the Baltic, the Baltic States informed
Great Britain that their policy of neutrality forbade them to accept USSR's
guaranties. |
June 29, 1939 France and Great Britain agree to not
object over Soviet "assistance" to Baltics in case of aggression on those
territories July 4, 1939 Molotov demands
right to invade Baltics based on "indirect aggression" |
According
to a news report of TASS, dated June 22, negotiations had come to a dead stop.
On June 29, there appeared a characteristic article by Zhdanov, Chairman of
the Foreign Commission, expounding the view that the guaranties may be enforced
upon the Baltic States. Finally, prevailed upon by M. Daladier, the French
Premier, His Majesty's Government agreed not to make objections to an automatic
assistance to the Baltic States by the Soviet Union in case of direct
aggression. On July 4, Molotov came forward with a new demand: the Soviet Union
should have the right to occupy the Baltic States even in the case of indirect
aggression which, according to the Kremlin, would happen when a constitutional
change would take place in one of the Baltic States. |
December 5, 1939 Later, it would appear Soviet
intentions have become clear to Great Britain, as it turns out, too
late... |
When the
Moscow negotiations proved fruitless, the Earl of Halifax characterized the
British attitude in a speech, held in the House of Lords on December 5, 1939:
"Events have shown that the judgment and the instinct of His Majesty's
Government in refusing agreement with the Soviet Government on the terms of
formulae covering cases of indirect aggression on the Baltic States were right.
For it is now plain that these formulae might have been the cloak of ulterior
designs...". |
August, 1939 von Ribbentrop arrives in Moscow |
In order
to extort from Hitler the greatest possible concessions by his prolonged
double-dealing and induce Berlin without further delay to accept the demands of
the Kremlin, Molotov staged a new act in his diplomatic comedy by requesting,
on July 20, that the French and British Governments immediately send their
delegations to Moscow for discussions of a military nature. When the
negotiations opened on August 12, War Commissar Voroshilov suggested
adjournment of the meetings until August 21, because (as it appeared
afterwards) the Kremlin was at that time expecting the German Foreign Minister,
von Ribbentrop, who was to arrive with special powers from Hitler. |
August 23, 1939 German-Russian non-aggression pact
signed. Estonia, Latvia (and other states) handed over to the USSR. |
As soon
as he arrived the negotiations started, Von Ribbentrop planed to divide Latvia
in a Soviet and a German part along the river Daugava (Düna) as stipulated
in the Treaties of Brest-Litovsk (1918), but Stalin announced that the Soviet
Union needed the Latvian ports of Liepaja and Ventspils. Ribbentrop telephoned
to Hitler who agreed to this demand. As early as August 23, 1939, the
German-Soviet non-aggression pact was signed. It was supplemented by a secret
protocol which referred to the division of Eastern Europe in Soviet and German
spheres of Influence. USSR was given a free hand in Finland, Estonia, Latvia,
Eastern Poland, and Besarabia while Lithuania and the western part of Poland
were left to Germany. |
|
|
|